Best 100 CHEF 2018 Best 100 CHEF 2017

Scopri il migliore ristorante di cucina altre cucine d'europanella città Peschici della Foggia

Scopri il migliore ristorante con GastroRanking

Ordinare per Ristoranti vicini
7,8
132
Recensioni

Porta di Basso


Peschici
15/08/2026: A truly evocative location, but with an important caveat: the true added value is only perceived if you're lucky enough to dine on the small terrace overlooking the sea. It's there that the experience takes on its charm and uniqueness; in other spaces, in my opinion, much of the effect is lost. The gastronomic offering consists exclusively of a mandatory tasting menu, with the option of choosing between two chef's menus. The wine list is extensive, varied, and absolutely appropriate for the restaurant's caliber and ambitions. As for the cuisine, the food is good, that's for sure. The ingredients and preparation are of a good standard, but personally, I didn't find any dishes that surprised or truly left a mark. Considering the recognition, the expectations raised, and especially the final bill, I would have expected something more. In the area, I've eaten better at restaurants with far fewer pretensions to exclusivity. And perhaps this is precisely the aspect that least convinced me: the exclusivity seemed more constructed and superficial than truly perceptible in the gastronomic experience. The final price also exceeded expectations, with some choices in the wording of the proposal that, in my opinion, seemed designed to further increase an already substantial bill. In conclusion: a splendid location if you dine on the small terrace overlooking the sea, good food but nothing particularly exciting, a decent wine list, and a somewhat unconvincing experience-to-price ratio. From a Michelin-starred restaurant with this positioning, I expected something more memorable.
31/07/2026: I dined at this restaurant with my partner. Let me start by saying that the food was good: I personally enjoyed every dish, even consuming my partner's portions, which, by contrast, he enjoyed less. If the assessment were based solely on the quality of the ingredients, it would be good, but the service showed objective shortcomings, unacceptable in a restaurant of this caliber. Facts: Welcome: When ordering, we were asked whether we preferred "public water" or "panna" (a type of cream). This approach was inappropriate for the setting and created unnecessary embarrassment for the guest. Presence of bones: A bone was found in my partner's sea bream fillet. When we reported it, the staff simply responded with a verbal "Sorry, we'll report it to the kitchen." In a restaurant of this caliber, the cleanliness of the fish must be impeccable, and if an error occurs, specific attention is expected when it comes to the bill. Allergy Management (the most serious incident): We reported my companion's hazelnut allergy at the beginning of the dinner. Despite this, the small pastry was served with two desserts containing hazelnuts. Upon our comment, the staff didn't replace the plate but simply removed the two pieces from the tray, effectively serving a smaller portion (four pieces instead of six) and demonstrating superficial management of allergen risks. A customer who chooses a restaurant of this caliber pays for overall excellence. Finding a bone in the fillet and, more importantly, suffering a food safety oversight without the establishment offering even the slightest gesture of consideration or a courtesy discount, makes the experience unsatisfactory from a service perspective.

1

Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter

Il tuo browser non ha questa funzionalità