01/04/2026: Try the carbonara! It's delicious.
26/03/2026: This stop on our Pizza Tour led us to a centrally located restaurant that offers a variety of options besides pizza. While booking for our large group was easy, we found the rigid two-seater system (7-9 PM and 9-11 PM) a bit unsettling, detracting from the relaxed atmosphere. Added to this is the inconvenience, for a large table, of not being able to request separate bills. The interior has a somewhat dated style and a very basic atmosphere, but this is offset by the overall cleanliness. Overall, we gave the Ambience and Service a score of 2.89 out of 5.
Moving on to the pizzas, we found them decidedly unconventional. The Aesthetics (2.56 out of 5) left us skeptical: the size is small (like a "baby") and the visual appearance could be more refined. The Cooked Pizza scores a 3.33 out of 5: the dough is thick and particularly crispy, more reminiscent of focaccia than traditional pizza in texture, but it's a bit too oily.
The Quality of the Ingredients scores the highest, 3.56 out of 5, thanks to generous toppings. However, the thickness of the dough tends to overwhelm the other ingredients, and the flavors weren't always convincing: the cherry tomatoes were bland, the spicy oil lacked punch, and we noticed an imbalance in the quantities, such as too much arugula. For these reasons, the Flavor category scores 2.89 out of 5.
Despite its small size, the pizza fills you up quickly, bringing the Value for Money to 2.89 out of 5. When asked directly, "Would you have it again tomorrow?", the group gave a low score of 2.11 out of 5, highlighting that, when considered a classic pizza, the experience struggles to hold its own.
We conclude with a final average score of 2.89 out of 5. It's a unique offering that may pique your interest for its diversity, but next time we might opt for the other dishes on the menu.